First of all, I would like to congratulate the
Crawford County Eagles boys’ basketball team for both their Region Championship
and their big win over Seminole County on Wednesday, February 17th.
In Wrestling action, Mathew Barajas placed 6th at the State Competition.
In Wrestling action, Mathew Barajas placed 6th at the State Competition.
I also want to congratulate Laura Meldrum on
receiving the IMPACT Award in Special Education recently at a GLRS luncheon in
Macon.
THE A-TEAM
A- Administrators
T- Teaching
E-Empowering
A-Assisting
M-Modeling/Monitoring
The A-Team met on February
9th to start deciding on true Vision, Mission, and Beliefs. They also
spent most of the afternoon refreshing their knowledge of unpacking the Georgia
Standards of Excellence (ELA and Math) and the GPS “for now” (Science and
Social Studies). The next meeting with the A-Team will be on March 21st,
and we will continue our training. I am sure the A-Team members from your
school have scheduled, or will schedule, a meeting for each school to work on
school level V,M, & B. Please take pride in this process. These three
things should guide your school and this system in all that we do. It
should not be something we just put on the website to be checked off for
AdvancED. The BOE has a work session on March 1st where I will be guiding
them through the same process. I am excited to have everyone in the boat
hopefully rowing in the same direction, because according to a Swahili proverb,
“A boat doesn’t go forward if each one is rowing their own way”.
Now on to some fun items, legislation!!!!!
SB 364 made it to the Senate
Education and Youth Committee on Wednesday, but no vote was taken. This
bill, as it is presented, will:
- Reduce state tests from 32 to 24.
- Allow fewer observations for veteran, high-performing
teachers.
- Requires an annual summative assessment for grades 3-12
to be used for student placement, not teacher evaluation.
- Requires GADOE to produce a readiness assessment for
first grade.
- Requires that standardized tests comprise 30% of a
teacher's evaluation; up to 10% of the 30% may be from multiple measures.
- For teachers of record that do not have a state
assessment, growth in student achievement shall comprise 30% based on
local formulation.
- School leaders shall have 40% of their evaluation based
on student achievement with a minimum of 30% from state tests.
- Students must attend 80% of the classes for a course to
be counted in the evaluation process.
- Strongly urges moving first semester tests to the last
week of the semester and end of year tests to the last two weeks of the
school year.
- Compels the GADOE to insure that alternative
assessments for students with disabilities comply with Federal law without
imposing undue burdens on the local school system.
These are steps in the right direction, but who
knows how they are going to pick this apart. I still do not like SLOs
being used as they are currently. I think learning targets and 8-10
formative assessments would do a better job of insuring growth (i.e. standard
mastery), but I have been voicing that opinion since Race To The Top began.
I do feel like the reduction of observations for veteran teachers is a
win.
HB 865, the BEST Act, would
establish a second income tax exemption program for students leaving public
school to attend a private school. In other words, a parent or a
grandparent can donate to this “scholarship” and they will receive an income
tax credit. The BEST act is better than the GOAL scholarship; however, if
the legislators will allow for a tax credit for donation to a private school
scholarship, they should allow for a tax credit for a donation to public
schools. I’m just saying.
HR 1344 is a proposed Constitutional amendment that
would allow a school district to call for a second ESPLOST if a county/city
discontinued its LOST. Proceeds of the second ESPLOST, if passed, must be
used to lower the millage rate limit. This amendment goes with HB 1005,
relating to that discontinuance. According to HB 1005, if the LOST or
HOST was discontinued due to a failure to file a new or revised distribution
certificate with the state revenue commissioner, the question cannot be taken
to the voters for five years, and all revenue from the LOST that the state
holds remains with the state instead of being distributed to the county and
qualified cities. In the meantime, this Constitutional amendment would
allow local boards to ask voters for that 1%. Sounds like a set up for a local
fight and an injustice to the cities and counties with the state retaining
local funds. "You snooze, you lose" is probably not the best
basis for tax policy. I think the additional 1% is a great idea for relieving
some of the burden on the property taxes, but pitting the local agencies
against one another is a terrible idea.
Once again, there is a more
complete list of current bills on the GAEL
website. The link to these Bills is right in the center of the page below
the legal issues ad.